 The reviewing process in the magazine begins with opening the issues and announcing the opening of a new issue of the magazine and announcing it on the magazine's website, stating the number and date of the issue, the rules of publication, and the cost of the research for Egyptians and foreigners, specifying the number of pages as an initial cost and the value of each paper in excess of the specified number.

 The magazine's management begins receiving research through the magazine's website, after which the reviewers are chosen from the list of reviewers, and it is required that the reviewer be:

1. A professor in the exact specialization of the research.
2. It is also required that there be two reviewers, one from within the educational institution and the other from outside.

 After that, the research is prepared to be sent to the reviewer after deleting all the researcher's data to ensure neutrality and objectivity and that the reviewing is blind to all parties and a maximum period of two weeks is granted for reviewing with sending the reviewing form and a form to obtain the reviewing reward.

 After the reviewers' decision is received, the decision is dealt with according to it. In the event of approval of publication in its current form, the research is prepared for printing according to the publication standards.

 In the event of any amendments, the researcher is contacted to make the amendments and return them to the reviewer for approval of accepting publication. In this case, the researcher amends what was requested of him without knowing the reviewer's identity to ensure transparency and objectivity.

 In the event that the reviewers reject for scientific or methodological reasons, the research is rejected and the researcher is notified of this, provided that he recovers what he paid, minus the reviewing fee.

 In the event that one of the reviewers rejects the research and the other accepts, a third reviewer is consulted who is the final reviewer in accepting or rejecting the research.

 After completing the collection of all the research, it is printed in one or two volumes, depending on the case, and then delivered to the researcher with the prescribed extracts. Thus, all reviewing procedures in a number of the magazines are completed.

 

 

Terms and conditions of publication:

- The research submitted by the student or researcher must be innovative and creative and present a new idea or develop a previous study.

- The owner of the study or research must pledge not to share the research or any part of it with another party and submit the pledge with the research files.

- Send two copies of the research in Arabic and English according to the requirements of each journal.

- Send the file in high quality, especially with regard to pictures, figures, tables, illustrations and maps.

- Include tables, pictures and diagrams in the research or place them in the appendix with a reference to them by a serial number, and it is necessary that they be clear and of high quality.

- Commitment to a specific number of pages, which is 20 pages

- Pages printed in A4 size and margins placed on each side.

- The researcher must fulfill and cover all the parts required of him in the research submitted to the scientific journal.

- Attach summaries of the research in Arabic and English.

 Adherence to the structure and foundations of the research from:

1. Introduction to the research, including (the study problem - study hypotheses - study objectives - importance of the study - study limits - study structure)
2. Theoretical framework and previous studies
3. Study methodology
4. Results and discussions.
5. Conclusion and recommendations.
6. References.

The process of reviewing scientific research papers is based on several criteria, including:

 The researcher's choice of an appropriate and distinctive title for the scientific research that indicates the idea of ​​the study and must be simple for the reader while avoiding the use of incomprehensible and complex words.

 The researcher must determine the purpose of the study and the reason for choosing the topic and what results from that.

Reasons for rejecting the research for publication:

 The research contains stolen information and ideas.

 The researcher's failure to adhere to the formats considered in the scientific research paper according to the rules of publishing the journal.

 Sending indicative information about the researcher, which is reflected in the reliability of the reviewing process.

 Lack of coherence between the title of the research, the idea and the content.

 The presence of linguistic and methodological errors in the research that the researcher wishes to publish in the scientific journal.